Fabrice Triboix

Falcon One

I help regulated companies build secure, scalable multi-tenant platforms on AWS & Kubernetes | Technology Advisor

linkedin.com/in/ftriboix

About

Summary

I help regulated and technology-led companies make better decisions about complex technology — particularly where AWS, Kubernetes, multi-tenancy, resilience and observability are critical.

After 25+ years in software and infrastructure engineering, I work independently with companies and investors on high-stakes technology questions:

  • Platform architecture: identifying architectural, security, scalability and operational risks before they become expensive problems.
  • Observability: turning fragmented telemetry and noisy alerting into reliable operational visibility.
  • Technical due diligence: giving investors an independent view of technology risk, engineering maturity and the implications for an investment.

My approach combines architectural judgement with hands-on engineering experience. I don't just assess systems from a distance — I've designed, built, secured and operated the kinds of platforms I review.

I focus on the questions that matter: What could go wrong? How significant is the risk? What needs to change? And what should happen next?

My engagements are focused, evidence-based and outcome-driven, giving founders, executives, engineering leaders and investors the clarity they need to make confident decisions.

If you have a difficult technology or platform question, send me a message on LinkedIn. Let's talk.

Services

Independent Technology Consulting Services

I help organisations that run, or are about to run, a multi-tenant platform on AWS and Kubernetes. The usual buyers are platform leads in banks, government, pharma and regulated scale-ups, and investors looking at those businesses.

Ongoing advisory work can emerge naturally from any of these engagements where there is a continuing need for independent technical judgement or for help with implementation.

01

Platform Architecture Review & Risk Assessment

What you will get

An independent assessment of whether your platform architecture is capable of supporting the company's next stage of growth — securely, reliably, and economically. If relevant, a risk assessment for compliance with regulations in your industry.

The engagement identifies material architectural and operational risks, explains their business impact, and provides a prioritised roadmap for addressing the issues that matter most.

Typical situations include:

  • A platform is becoming difficult to scale or operate.
  • Kubernetes or AWS architecture has grown organically and is now complex.
  • Multi-tenancy, isolation, resilience or security concerns are emerging.
  • The company is preparing for enterprise customers, fundraising, acquisition or a major growth phase.
  • Leadership needs an independent view of technical risk before making significant investment decisions.

Typical scope

The assessment is tailored to the platform, but may include:

  • AWS and cloud architecture
  • Kubernetes architecture and platform design
  • Multi-tenancy and tenant isolation
  • Availability, resilience and disaster recovery
  • Security architecture and trust boundaries
  • Networking, identity and access
  • Infrastructure and deployment architecture
  • Observability and operational readiness
  • Scalability and capacity
  • Platform complexity and technical debt
  • Cloud economics and architectural cost drivers
  • Engineering/platform operating model where relevant
  • Governance, compliance and regulatory issues

Deliverables

  • Executive-level assessment of the platform
  • Architecture and risk findings
  • Prioritised risk register
  • Identification of material architectural weaknesses and dependencies
  • Business impact and severity of key risks
  • Recommended remediation priorities
  • Target-state or architectural recommendations where appropriate
  • Practical roadmap for the next phase
  • Executive presentation / readout
2–4 weeks | from $10,000

The final scope and investment depend on platform complexity, environments, tenancy model, regulatory requirements and the depth of assessment required.

02

Observability & Alerting Uplift

What you will get

A practical assessment and improvement of observability and alerting so that engineering teams can detect important problems quickly, understand what is happening, and respond without being overwhelmed by noise.

The engagement addresses the gap between having monitoring and having useful operational visibility. However, we can also start from scratch if you don't have an observability stack running already.

Typical situations include:

  • Alerts are noisy, poorly prioritised or routinely ignored.
  • Production incidents are discovered by customers before engineers.
  • Teams struggle to understand failures across distributed systems.
  • Dashboards exist but do not support effective incident response.
  • Kubernetes/platform telemetry is inconsistent or incomplete.
  • Leadership wants greater confidence in reliability and operational maturity.

Typical scope

Depending on the environment:

  • Metrics, logs and traces
  • Service and platform instrumentation
  • Kubernetes and infrastructure observability
  • Application and dependency visibility
  • SLOs, SLIs and service health indicators
  • Alerting strategy and alert quality
  • Alert routing, severity and ownership
  • Dashboards and operational views
  • Incident detection and troubleshooting workflows
  • Observability architecture and tooling
  • Gaps, duplication and unnecessary telemetry
  • Cost and operational overhead of observability

Deliverables

  • Current-state observability assessment
  • Observability and alerting gap analysis
  • Prioritised recommendations
  • Alert catalogue / alerting strategy
  • Recommended SLIs/SLOs where appropriate
  • Dashboard and operational-view recommendations
  • Target-state observability architecture
  • Prioritised implementation backlog
  • Selected high-value improvements implemented or demonstrated, depending on engagement level
  • Executive/engineering readout
3-10 weeks | from $20,000

The final scope and investment depend on system complexity, number of services/environments, existing tooling and whether implementation is included.

03

Technical Risk Assessment for VCs

What you will get

An independent technical assessment that helps investors understand the technology risks behind a prospective investment — and whether the platform and engineering organisation can support the company's business plan.

The focus is not simply on finding technical debt. It is on identifying material risks that could affect valuation, growth, scalability, resilience, security, regulatory readiness or the investment thesis.

Typical situations include:

  • Pre-investment technical due diligence
  • Follow-on investment decisions
  • Acquisition or strategic investment
  • A company is entering a new regulated or enterprise market
  • The investment thesis depends on rapid platform scaling
  • Investors need an independent technical perspective alongside management's assessment

Typical scope

Tailored to the investment thesis and time available, potentially including:

  • System and platform architecture
  • AWS/cloud infrastructure
  • Kubernetes and platform engineering
  • Multi-tenancy and isolation
  • Scalability and resilience
  • Security architecture
  • Operational maturity and observability
  • Technology debt and architectural constraints
  • Engineering organisation and key-person dependency
  • Development and release practices
  • Cloud economics and scalability of operating costs
  • Regulatory/enterprise-readiness considerations
  • Critical third-party dependencies
  • Technology roadmap and alignment with business plan

Deliverables

  • Independent technical risk assessment
  • Executive summary for the investment team
  • Material risks and investment implications
  • Risk register with severity/prioritisation
  • Assessment of scalability and architectural viability
  • Key dependencies and potential failure points
  • Assessment of engineering/platform maturity
  • Areas requiring further investigation
  • Recommended pre- or post-investment actions
  • Investor briefing / Q&A session
1–3 weeks | from $12,000

The final investment depends on the complexity of the target, available documentation/access, investment thesis, time available and depth of diligence required.

Work

Case studies